Two
tournament officials helped in a ball search about thirty yards right of the
third fairway. We eventually found the
ball near a split rail fence. The ball
was about two feet on the green side of the fence, an obstruction (Rule 24-2) which interfered with the
player’s swing, and about 140 yards from the green. Since the fence line ran fairly close to
perpendicular to the player’s line to the flagstick, it appeared that his
nearest point of full relief was going to be behind the fence. Since the ground in that area was thick and
weedy, the player deduced that he could take full relief on the green side of
the fence, IF he removed the top rail of the fence, which was easily done. (So the fence was both a movable and
immovable obstruction!) We determined that it was indeed a nearer point of relief
than straight back. He played the shot
toward the green, replaced the top rail, and went on his way.
Up near the
green another player had plugged his approach shot in the virtually vertical face
of the bunker. He had no stance, no
shot. We’ve all seen a player take two
or more swings at a ball in a position like this without improving his position. He asked if he could take an unplayable lie
(Rule 28), and what his options were. He
chose to drop two club-lengths from where the ball lay, in a level lie in the
bottom of the bunker. His other options
would have been to drop on a line from the flagstick to the ball straight back,
staying in the bunker (virtually identical to the option he took), or take a
stroke and distance penalty.
For another good example of a player using his options to great advantage, read Ryan Farb's write up from The Goodwin-- The Power Line Ruling
For another good example of a player using his options to great advantage, read Ryan Farb's write up from The Goodwin-- The Power Line Ruling
No comments:
Post a Comment